However, what Hegel misses is how, once we are within the human condition, sexuality is not only transformed or civilised ― but, much more radically, is changed in its very substance. It is no longer the instinctual drive to reproduce, but a drive that gets thwarted as to its natural goal (reproduction) and thereby explodes into an infinite, properly meta-physical passion. The becoming-cultural of sexuality is thus not the becoming-cultural of nature, but the attempt to domesticate a properly unnatural excess of the metaphysical sexual passion.
This is the properly dialectical reversal of substance: the moment when the immediate substantial ("natural") starting point is not only acted upon, transformed, mediated/cultivated, but changed in its very substance. We not only work upon and thus transform nature; in a gesture of retroactive reversal, nature itself radically changes its "nature." (In an homologous way, once we enter the domain of legal civil society, the previous tribal order of honour and revenge is deprived of its nobility and appears as common criminality.)
This is why Catholics who insist that only sex for procreation is human while coupling for lust is animal totally miss the point and end up celebrating the animality of humans.
Read the full article here.